Thursday, September 13, 2018

Canada Attacks Saudi Arabia Human Rights Abuses

تغريدة السفارة الكندية في الرياض



Did Saudis Just Threaten Canada With 9/11-Style Attack for Crime of Criticizing Their Atrocious Human Rights Record?


With hundreds of billions in arms deals from the U.S. and U.K., the Saudi regime is being given carte blanche 

"The U.S. must be clear in condemning repression, especially when done by governments that receive our support." 
—Sen. Bernie Sanders


Sunday, September 9, 2018

Sherin Khankan is Denmark's first female imam

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/islam-shows-its-female-face-with-rise-of-women-mosques/ar-BBMU0Kt?ocid=spartanntp



Sherin Khankan, founder and Imam of women's mosque Mariam Mosque, poses for a photo for the Thomson Reuters Foundation inside the prayer room at her mosque in Copenhagen, Denmark, 24 August 2018. 

Sherin Khankan.jpg
COPENHAGEN (Thomson Reuters Foundation) — Relegated to the basement, silenced by the imam and barred from the front door, some Muslim women have had enough of male domination at the mosque and are setting up their own.


From Copenhagen to Los Angeles, a handful of female mosques now cater to Muslim women who want their own place of worship, just as men have had through the ages.
"It is possible to change a narrative that has been patriarchal for centuries," Sherin Khankan, founder of Europe's first women's mosque, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Her first-floor mosque - adjacent to a clothes shop - is invisible from the busy Danish shopping street below. But behind its anonymous, grey door, a quiet revolution is brewing.
For the past two years, women have been leading prayers, delivering sermons and running Copenhagen's Mariam Mosque - though Khankan says she is not challenging the Koran, just rewriting a male-dominated way of worship.
"We can do that by promoting and disseminating new narratives, with a focus on gender equality. It's not a reform. We're going back to the essence of Islam," she said, draping a red floral shawl across her shoulder.
Although men and women are allowed to meet and pray during the week at Mariam Mosque, the mosque's monthly, collective Friday prayers are for women only, said 43-year-old Khankan.
With a tiny prayer room and simple decor of candles, cushions and rugs, the mosque has about 150 worshippers. It was set up by Khankan with the support of Femimam, a group of female Muslim spiritual leaders in Denmark.
OVERLOOKED
Muslim women's groups and researchers say there is a lack of female Islamic leaders and dearth of worship spaces for women, since most mosques are gender-segregated and men dominate the main prayer rooms.
So, after 15 years in the making, Mariam Mosque joined a handful of female-friendly mosques, including two in Los Angeles, another in the German city of Berlin - which welcomes men and women to Friday prayers - and a new build slated for the northern English city of Bradford, where there are plans to build Britain's first women-led mosque by 2020.
Women-only mosques have existed for hundreds of years in China, where women have had a long tradition of leading prayers.
Director of Britain's Muslim Women's Council Bana Gora, who is spearheading the Bradford project, said mosques had overlooked women and girls for years.
She said some women have had to pray in basements of mosques, or use back entrances where there are safety concerns such as a lack of lighting or security.
"Where do women congregate to talk about issues in society? You need a dedicated space where women can convene and talk to people who can help them, and we simply do not have those spaces anywhere," she said in a telephone interview.
"It's about women claiming their space in a mosque - there's nothing wrong with that. I can see this catapulting across different faiths as well over time," said Gora.
ISOLATED
Khankan said the presence of fellow women in a mosque, as well as access to female spiritual leaders, meant women might feel comfortable seeking help for sensitive issues like inter-faith marriage or domestic violence.
And for the 200 or so women in Denmark who wear a face veil, their world has grown smaller after a ban on niqab veils and body-length burqas in public spaces, said Khankan.
Denmark's parliament enacted the ban in May, joining France and some other European Union countries to uphold what some politicians say are secular and democratic values.
The justice ministry said the ban would focus on women forced by their families to wear veils.
"If a woman is isolated and forced to wear a burqa or the niqab, by criminalizing it, you will isolate her even more, because she might not be able to go out," said Khankan, who also runs a domestic violence support group, Exit Circle.
"It's important to fight for any women's right to wear the hijab or not, to wear the niqab or not - if it's her own choice and her own free will," she said.
THE FUTURE
Khankan said she hopes to see a new generation of female Islamic scholars and worship leaders, or 'imam' - a title normally given to men, which Khankan has proudly claimed.
"We are faced with patriarchal structures which we have normalized for decades. As long as they are alive and they are not challenged, we have a problem," said Khankan.
"We have to state that women are the future of Islam. We have to make it possible for women to have the same possibilities as men," she added.
The Koran does not directly address whether women can lead congregational prayer, according to many traditional Islamic scholars.
Some argue the Prophet Mohammad gave permission to women to lead any kind of prayer, while others say that he meant to restrict women to leading prayer at home.
Still, many traditionalists do not believe a man should hear a woman's voice in prayer.
But Giulia Liberatore, who is researching female Islamic scholars at the University of Edinburgh, said seeing women reach positions of power in Islam will have positive effects.
"If women see other women striving for the highest form of scholarship, they will start seeing themselves as someone who can do that as well," she said.

Sherin Khankan

Imam
Sherin Khankan is Denmark's first female imam who has led the foundation of a women-led mosque in Copenhagen called Mariam Mosque. She is also an activist on Muslim issues including female integration and extremism, and has written numerous texts discussing Islam and politics.
  • Born: Oct 13, 1974 (age 43) · Denmark
  • Nationality: Danish

Monday, August 27, 2018

Serbian Arkan Željko Ražnatović the Butcher of Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo

SUNDAY, AUGUST 15, 2010


Serbian Arkan Željko Ražnatović the Butcher of Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo







Arkan was assassinated in 2000 before his trial.

In March 1999, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) announced that Zeljko Raznjatovic (Arkan) had been indicted by the Tribunal, although the indictment was only made public after Arkan’s assassination.

According to the indictment Arkan should have been prosecuted on 24 charges of crimes against humanity (Art. 5 ICTY Statute), grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions (Art. 2 ICTY Statute) and violations of the laws of war (Art. 3 ICTY Statute), for the following acts:[10]

Forcibly detaining approximately thirty non-Serb men and one woman, without food or water, in an inadequately ventilated boiler room of approximately five square metres in size.
Transporting twelve non-Serb men from Sanski Most to an isolated location in the village of Trnova, where they shot and killed eleven of the men and critically wounded the twelfth.
The rape of a Muslim woman on a bus outside the Hotel Sanus in Sanski Most.
Transporting approximately sixty-seven non-Serb men and one woman from Sanski Most, Sehovci, and Pobrijeze to an isolated location in the village of Sasina and shooting them, killing sixty-five of the captives and wounding two survivors.
Forcibly detaining approximately thirty-five non-Serb men in an inadequately ventilated boiler room of about five square metres in size, beat them, and withheld from them food and water, resulting in the deaths of two men.
It is claimed that Arkan was individually responsible for the crimes alleged against him in this indictment pursuant to Art. 7 § 1 of the ICTY Statute. But Arkan was also or alternatively criminally responsible as a commander for the acts of his subordinates pursuant to Art. 7 § 3 of the ICTY Statute, since he had at all times the complete authority to direct and control all of the actions of the members of his paramilitary unit.
Assassination

Arkan's graveArkan was assassinated, on 15 January 2000, 17:05 GMT, in the lobby of Belgrade's elite InterContinental Hotel, a location where he was surrounded by other hotel guests. The killer, Dobrosav Gavrić, was a 23-year-old police mobile brigade's junior member. Gavrić had ties to the underworld and was on sick leave at the time. He walked up alone towards his target from behind. Arkan was seating and chatting with two of his friends and, according to BBC Radio, was filling out a betting slip. Gavrić waited for a few minutes, calmly walked up behind the party, and rapidly fired a succession of bullets from his CZ-99 duty-issued pistol. Arkan was shot in his left eye and lapsed into a coma on the spot.[11] His bodyguard Zvonko Mateović put him into a car, and rushed him to a hospital, but he died on the way. According to an article on NPR, Milošević's own men may have killed him for knowing too much 
Hotel IntercontinentalArkan's companions, Milenko Mandić, a business manager, and Dragan Garić, a police inspector, were also shot to death by Gavrić. Gavrić was shot and wounded immediately after by Arkan's bodyguard, Zvonko Mateović, and fell unconscious. A woman bystander was seriously wounded in a shootout between the two as well. After complicated surgery, Gavrić survived, but remained disabled and confined to a wheelchair as result of a spinal wound.

Serbian Arkan Željko Ražnatović the Butcher of Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo

http://www.quickiwiki.com/en/%C5%BDeljko_Ra%C5%BEnatovi%C4%87
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%BDeljko_Ra%C5%BEnatovi%C4%87

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

قصص وصور التعذيب فى سوريا والعراق

سوريون يروون لحظات الرعب التي عاشوها بسجون “ب ي د/بي كاكا” في عفرين

روى سوريون ناجون من أحد مراكز احتجاز الإرهابيين في بلدة “راجو” بمنطقة عفرين، عمليات التعذيب ولحظات الرعب التي عاشوها، من تنظيم “ي ب ك / بي كا كا” الإرهابي، قبل تحريرهم بفضل عملية غصن الزيتون.
وأفردت قناة “تي آر تي كردي” التركية الرسمية في خبر لها، شهادات لضحايا التعذيب بينهم نساء وأطفال في مراكز احتجاز الإرهابيين براجو.
وأظهرت مقاطع فيديو للقناة، أماكن التعذيب والزنازين الضيقة المعتمة في المركز المسمى “السجن الأسود”، فضلا عن العثور على ملابس عائدة لأطفال داخله.
ونقل الخبر عن القائد في الجيش السوري الحر أحمد بادرلي، قوله، “كانوا يرطمون رأسي بالجدار في السجن الأسود، جراء ذلك تجمع الدم في أذني ما أدى إلى فقدان السمع بإحداها، كما أنهم (عناصر ي ب ك / بي كا كا) قتلوا زوجتي وأولادي”.
من جانبه، ذكر الطبيب نادل حيدر من عفرين، أن إرهابيين اثنين قاموا بربطه وإطفاء سيجارة بعينه، ثم طرحوه أرضا وركلوه.
بدوره، لفت المدني من عفرين آزاد أحمد، أن من يدخل إلى السجن الأسود يفقد أمله بالخروج.
وأضاف “كانوا يُفقدونهم سمعهم، ويعمونهم، ويكسرون أرجلهم وأقفاصهم الصدرية”.
وفي الخبر، أشار أحمد إلى الزنازين التي احتجز الإرهابيون المدنيين فيها، وقال “قتلوا الناس هنا، أنظروا ربما كان في هذه الزنازين أكثر من 100 شخص”.
وأوضح أن الإرهابيين طلبوا من الناس هنا أن ينضموا إليهم أو يحتجزوهم.
وأردف “قالوا إن من لا ينضمون لنا سنقوم بجعلهم عميانا وصما، وسنقطع ألسنتهم، ونقتلع أظافرهم، ونكسر أفخاذهم”.
وبيّن أحمد، أن الموت كان سبيل النجاة للمحتجزين هنا، وأن المركز يحتوي على 100 زنزانة.
وأشار إلى وجود أطفال ونساء ومسنين فيه.
وفي 18 مارس / آذار الماضي، أعلن الجيش التركي السيطرة على كامل قرى وبلدات منطقة عفرين بعد أسبوع من تحرير مركزها.
وأطلقت القوات المسلحة عملية “غصن الزيتون” في 20 يناير / كانون الثاني الماضي بالتعاون مع “الجيش السوري الحر”، لتحرير المنطقة من إرهابيي منظمة “ي ب ك / بي كا كا”.
http://www.turkeyalaan.net/2018/04/%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B8%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%B9%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%88%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A8/

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Ratko Mladic Jailed for Life for Bosnian War Crimes, Genocide

Former Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladic (AFP/File)

Evstafiev-ratko-mladic-1993-w.jpg


bosnian-serb-commander-ratko-mladic-genocide-crimes-against-humanity-verdict-11-21-2017





  • Former commander Ratko Mladic was jailed for life by U.N. judges for crimes against humanity, including genocide
  • He was also found "significantly responsible" for the genocide of 8,000 Muslims at Srebrenica in 1995
  • Judges also said Bosnian Serb forces under Mladic's command had taken part in a range of war crimes
  • The more-than-500-day trial called 591 witnesses and saw 9,914 pieces of evidence accepted by the court

Former Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladic was jailed for life by U.N. judges on Wednesday after being found guilty of crimes against humanity, including genocide.
He was also found to have had "significant responsibility" for the genocide of over 8,000 Muslim men and boys committed at Srebrenica in 1995.
Judges for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) sitting in The Hague unanimously found Mladic guilty of culpability in the Srebrenica murders which took place towards the end of the country's brutal three-year civil war.
Mladic faced two counts of genocide, among other crimes, but although the court found him guilty over his role in Srebrenica he was found not guilty of genocide in six other Bosnian municipalities: Foca, Kljuc, Kotor-Varos, Prijedor, Sanski Most and Vlasenica.
He was also convicted of a string of crimes against humanity, including persecution, extermination, murder, murder as a violation of the laws of war and forced deportations.
Sitting wearing a black suit and red tie, the 74-year-old former general shook his head as a lengthy and detailed summary of the tribunal's findings began to be read out.
Proceedings were interrupted as he first demanded a bathroom break. This was granted but was later followed by a request from the defense team for a blood test.
Chairman of the Trial Chamber, Alphons Orie, then ordered Mladic be removed the courtroom for cursing and shouting.
The summary continued and descriptions of the crimes detailed in the judges’ summary were graphic, with details of summary executions, forced separations and the torture of detainees.
Judges also said Bosnian Serb forces under Mladic's command had taken part in a range of war crimes.
These forces were also found guilty of spreading terror among civilian populations in the capital Sarajevo and in other parts of Bosnia, in an attempt to clear non-Serbs from certain territories.
There were tense scenes as relatives of those killed in the Srebrenica genocide watched the proceedings via video link from Bosnia.


‘Butcher of Bosnia’
Mladic, now 74, was once Europe's most wanted man after his role in the 1992-1995 Bosnian War.
He was the commander of the Army of Republika Srpska which was established in Bosnia-Herzegovina at the beginning of the country’s civil war amid the breakup of Yugoslavia.
He and the forces under his command were linked to genocide committed in Bosnia, particularly in Srebrenica, Europe's worst atrocity since World War II, after Serb forces overran an enclave supposed to be under the protection of U.N. peacekeepers.
However, Mladic is also known for his forces’ bloody 1,425-day siege of Sarajevo, the longest of a capital city in the history of modern warfare.
A 15-year manhunt ended in 2011 when Mladic was found and handed over to The Hague tribunal for trial on May 31 that year.
Wednesday's 523-day trial ended in the conviction of Mladic on a range of war crimes charges.
The court itself will wind up on Dec. 31, bringing an end to a painful and bloody chapter in postwar European history.
http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/ratko-mladic-verdict-live-blog-11-21-2017
A small group of protesters gathered in the southern Bosnian town of Trebinje expressing their dissatisfaction with Ratko Mladic's verdict. 

They chanted Mladic's name and sang songs to honour the former Bosnian Serb military chief, who they described as a hero.

"Unfortunately, there are few of us here. The former fighters’ union did nothing to organise this. I am happy young people came because they are the future. They stand here with their heads high, because they have nothing to be ashamed of. We fought valiantly for Republika Srpska," said Nebojsa Milisic a former Bosnian Serb army serviceman.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

عبد الحميد اليوسف.. فقد زوجته وأطفاله وأخويه في مجزرة خان شيخون












بيديه الاثنين.. حمل "عبد الحميد اليوسف" جثماني طفليه "أحمد وآية" ( 3 سنوات)، ليدفنهما ضمن ضحايا مجزرة خان شيخون أمس الثلاثاء.
اليوسف فقد 25 فردا من أفراد عائلته ضمن ضحايا المجزرة، بينهم طفلاه وزوجته وأخواه الاثنان وزوجتاهما وأولادهم الثلاثة وأولاد عمه، بالإضافة إلى 40 مصابا من نفس العائلة، وقد قتل جيرانه جميعا.
وقتل في نفس المجزرة 11 فردا من عائلة "القدح" التي كانت تعيش بجوار عائلة "اليوسف".
ولا يزال المصابون يتلقون العلاج من الإصابات التي تعرضوا لها جراء استنشاق الغازات السامة.
http://mubasher.aljazeera.net/news/%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%81-%D9%81%D9%82%D8%AF-%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%87-%D9%88%D8%A3%D8%B7%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%88%D8%A3%D8%AE%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%87-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE%D9%88%D9%86

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Trump used to think Assad could keep power A brutal sarin attack

Trump used to think Assad could keep power. A brutal sarin attack has changed his mind.

It’s taken less than two days for President Trump’s Syria policy to go from Bashar al-Assad can stay to Assad must go. The question now is whether Trump is willing to do something President Obama wouldn’t: use US military force to punish the Syrian dictator for using chemical weapons against his own people.
Trump is notoriously hard to predict, but he has told lawmakers he’s actively considering a military response to a suspected sarin gas attack this week in Syria that killed at least 85 people. And Defense Secretary James Mattis will reportedly meet with Trump Thursday night to present possible options for hitting Syrian government and military targets. (One thing seemingly not under consideration: a full-fledged effort to dislodge Assad himself.)
Images of the Syrian men, women, and children who suffocated to death seemed to shock Trump, who spoke Wednesday of the “beautiful little babies” killed in the attack, which he described as “an affront to humanity”
Trump went even further Thursday, telling reporters that “something should happen” to Assad because of his responsibility for the attack. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, meanwhile, said Assad would have “no role” governing Syria in the future and that “steps are underway” for a US-led international push to remove him.
If you think all of that sounds a lot like what you heard during the Obama administration, you’d be right. And if you think all of that sounds like the polar opposite of what you’ve been hearing from the Trump administration until just a few days ago, you’d be right again.

ake US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, who said in March that “our priority is no longer to sit there and focus on getting Assad out.” Or take Tillerson himself, who said in late March that “the longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.”
All of that has changed — rapidly. The president who campaigned on an “America first” platform of keeping the US out of conflicts that don’t directly impact core US national security interests now seems ready to intervene in Syria’s intractable civil war. The president who has talked of building closer ties to Vladimir Putin may soon start bombing the Arab dictator Putin has spent years propping up. And the president who was silent just days ago about Assad’s future is now clearly saying the dictator needs to go.
What a difference 24 hours can make.

Earlier this week, Trump seemed fine with Assad staying in power

Let’s rewind the tape back to Monday, when reports first began to circulate of a gas attack by the Syrian regime on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun that killed at least 85 people — including 16 women and 23 children — and wounded more than 350. Videos and photos taken by activists and medics on the scene showed victims choking and fainting, some with foam coming out of their mouths. (Assad’s forces later bombed the medical clinic where many survivors were being treated.)
On Tuesday, with the dead still being counted, White House press secretary Sean Spicer saidthat the US would look “rather silly not acknowledging the political realities that exist in Syria,” where Assad’s hold on power has been getting stronger by the day — in large part due to Russian military support.
Trump’s own initial comments focused more on his predecessor’s past handling of Syria than on Assad’s possible role in the country’s future. In a written statement, Trump said Assad’s “heinous actions” were a “consequence of the past administration's weakness and irresolution. President Obama said in 2012 that he would establish a 'red line' against the use of chemical weapons and then did nothing.”
There were two notable things about the statement. The first was how politically petty and tone-deaf it was for Trump to bash Obama in the same breath as Assad. The second was that it didn’t say Assad needed to give up power — or that the US was willing to do much of anything to bring that about.
By Wednesday, Trump was singing a different tune. He said Assad’s gas attack “had a big impact on me,” and that “it’s very possible … that my attitude toward Syria and Assad has changed.”
"It crossed a lot of lines for me," Trump told reporters at the White House. "When you kill innocent children, innocent babies, babies, little babies, with a chemical gas that is so lethal, people were shocked to hear what gas it was, that crosses many, many lines, beyond a red line. Many, many lines."
This paired well with tough talk from Haley, who gave an impassioned speech at the UN that same day in which she held up photos of children killed in the gas attack and asked, "How many more children have to die before Russia cares?” — a clear dig at Putin, Assad’s primary overseas backer (and an autocrat whom Trump openly admires).
That set the stage for Thursday, when Trump talked tough on Assad and avoided making another gratuitous dig at his predecessor. Tillerson — without saying so explicitly — implied that the administration would for now basically maintain Obama’s Syria policy, which was predicated on Assad eventually relinquishing power after internationally led diplomatic talks.
For good measure, the secretary of state directed Russia to "consider carefully" its continued support for Assad's government. That’s highly unlikely. Although Putin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday that their support for Assad wasn’t “unconditional,” Moscow has said this many times before, and its support has so far remained just that — unconditional.

Donald Trump, humanitarian?

There is something a little jarring in hearing Trump speak so openly about potentially using force against Assad because of his human rights violations and repeated use of chemical weapons. This isn’t the Trump of the recent past.
It’s also not clear that it will prove to be the Trump of the present. After all, Obama and his allies were prepared to launch airstrikes after Assad’s 2013 sarin gas attack on Ghouta, only to back down at the last moment after Russia brokered a deal for Assad to give up most of his chemical weapons stockpiles (although Monday’s attack shows he obviously didn’t give all of them away).
Trump, though, fashions himself a tough guy, one willing to go where his predecessor would not. In this case, that would likely mean sending US warplanes, drones, and cruise missiles into Syria. It wouldn’t be the America-first stance of Trump’s campaign; it would be the start of something new and uncharted.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/4/6/15210788/trump-syria-policy-assad-chemical-weapon-tillerson-obama